Closing the month should be a review pass, not a matching exercise. We automate the match so the close stops depending on someone having the time.
Payouts land on one schedule, bookings on another, and fees get deducted somewhere between the two. Someone opens both, works down the rows, and marks off what agrees. The ones that do not agree get set aside for later, and later is usually the day before the numbers are due. The work is not difficult. It is long, and it happens every single month.
We build the matching logic that reconciles those records on a schedule, flags only the rows that genuinely disagree, and leaves a record of why each match was made. Your close becomes a review of exceptions rather than a pass over everything. It runs whether or not anyone remembers to start it, and it runs against the systems you already use.
A property manager running 10 properties across 4 countries stopped spending 11 hours a month on manual data entry.
Their month-end close now takes about 40 minutes. The build took four weeks.
Most operators can name the reconciliation that holds up their close. Tell us which one it is and we will scope that fix on its own.